Mark scheme
(a) [1]
- sugars are colourless / the spots have no colour (1)
(b) [2]
- spray the (dried) chromatogram with (or dip it in) a locating agent (1)
- the spots become coloured / visible, so their positions can be marked (1)
- IGNORE names of specific locating agents
(c)(i) [2]
- Rf = distance travelled by substance ÷ distance travelled by solvent, e.g. 2.4 ÷ 9.6 (1)
- 0.25 and 0.75 (1)
- ALLOW first mark for either value correct with method shown
- REJECT values greater than 1 (e.g. 9.6 ÷ 2.4 = 4) for the second mark
(c)(ii) [1]
- sucrose and fructose (1)
- ECF from (c)(i) if the Rf values are between 0 and 1 and match two sugars in the table
(d) [1]
- the Rf value of a substance depends on the solvent / a substance has different Rf values in different solvents (1)
- ALLOW the solubility of the sugar (and so the distance it travels) is different in different solvents
Worked solution
(a) The sugars do separate as the solvent moves up the paper, but because they are colourless, nothing can be seen on the dried paper.
(b) After drying, the chromatogram is sprayed with (or dipped in) a locating agent. This reacts with the sugars to make coloured spots, so their positions can be marked with a pencil and measured.
(c)(i) Rf = distance travelled by substance ÷ distance travelled by solvent.
- spot 1: 2.4 ÷ 9.6 = 0.25
- spot 2: 7.2 ÷ 9.6 = 0.75
Check: each value is less than 1, as it must be, because a substance cannot travel further than the solvent front. Working backwards, 0.25 × 9.6 = 2.4 cm and 0.75 × 9.6 = 7.2 cm, which match the measured distances.
(c)(ii) An Rf of 0.25 matches sucrose and an Rf of 0.75 matches fructose.
(d) How far a substance moves depends on how soluble it is in the solvent. In a different solvent the same sugar would have a different Rf value, so comparisons are only valid if the same solvent is used.